I really value your opinion on most programming matters but I have to respectfully disagree. I can understand someone having a problem with c#'s syntax in general. But in this case I had more trouble with verifying the algorithm than with the type annotations. They might require some carefull reading but you have to keep track of only two types so the cognitive load is minimal. More importantly, writing these function definitions makes using the functions really easy (auto complete support etc.)
that being said I don't really like the tone of the code's author who poses the question on his blog with fake honesty hoping everyone will laurel his clever solution.
that being said I don't really like the tone of the code's author who poses the question on his blog with fake honesty hoping everyone will laurel his clever solution.