> I understand this is just a funny page with some metrics, but seriously calling people who added most LOC the most “productive” developers is somewhat disingenious.
This sentence contradicts itself.
> Is there any current reason to still use CVS in 2015?
The funny thing is that even though they have OpenCVS in their source tree, they do not use it. It never took off and probably had too many bugs and issues.
Instead they are and have been using GNU CVS instead.
OpenCVS was linked to the normal build for a while but has been removed from it four years ago.
This sentence contradicts itself.
> Is there any current reason to still use CVS in 2015?
http://www.openbsd.org/opencvs/