The interpretations you've suggested go far beyond interpreting PG's argument in the strongest possible terms, running instead to interpreting it as a completely different argument. (Although I suppose that's not very charitable of me).
Obviously anything is unobjectionable if you agree beforehand to disregard any interpretation you could possibly find objectionable.
Obviously anything is unobjectionable if you agree beforehand to disregard any interpretation you could possibly find objectionable.