Is there a reason the variables in the first example are titled 'x1' through 'x13'? Seems strange and undesirable compared even pseudo-meaning variable names. As another post mentioned, sample code lives forever but this particular coding style isn't what I would to see sticking around.
I agree that it seems like an odd practice, could be a mental artifact from using the scala interpreter. When you create objects in the interpreter w/o a name it is starts enumerating at res0.
Welcome to Scala version 2.7.5.final (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, Java 1.6.0_15).
Type in expressions to have them evaluated.
Type :help for more information.
scala> "hello"
res0: java.lang.String = hello
scala> "world"
res1: java.lang.String = world