If we take the global perspective the quality of the state funded safety nets combined with the local culture and job market greatly affect what the implications of a lay-off are. And they can vary drastically.
For instance in the USA the economically worse off are in relative terms considerably more worse off than in countries with lower income inequality.
I don't think I argued that - but that the amount of economic options available to individuals should not be deduced from comparing GDP or such. I think in eastern europe most countries are still civilized enough to offer basic medical care without insurance?
Any way, I have no local knowledge of either issue ... I'm located in northern europe.
For instance in the USA the economically worse off are in relative terms considerably more worse off than in countries with lower income inequality.