Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No, that's a nominal mean lifetime.

Panels degrade at ~0.5 - 0.8% per year (for various reasons), and are considered candidates for replacement when they've deteriorate to 80% of rated capacity. See the NREL study referenced elsewhere in this thread.

I do suspect that extending the life of solar plant may well help reduce total costs.




Omni's point is that they are "considered candidates for replacement" by companies with a vested interest in selling you replacements.

I'm sure that car makers consider a 3 year old car a "candidate for replacement" as well. Doesn't make it worthless or not worthy of continuing to run rather than investing in replacing...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: