If you use a SaaS that can't deal with demand growth, you use another SaaS or build your own system. If you use a city that can't deal with demand growth for whatever reason... you try to grow demand further?
Anyway - what's income inequality like in those other cities? Similar?
> If you use a SaaS that can't deal with demand growth, you use another SaaS or build your own system.
Obviously that's not similar. You can't "switch" cities like you switch your phone company. You can't build your own city. You aren't arguing that it would be bad for the SaaS for it to be used too much so everyone should try to stop using it to stop hurting it. You are not a city's "client".
Are you saying it would be in their best interest to move away and they're behaving irrationally against their own best interest for not doing so, or that it's a moral thing and they should all choose to uproot themselves according to moral imperatives?
> If you use a city that can't deal with demand growth for whatever reason... you try to grow demand further?
It would be ridiculous to say they are "trying" to grow real estate demand, as if that's something they collectively would or could try to do. Note almost all of these companies started out tiny and slowly grew locally over time and never decided to move in en masse.
> Anyway - what's income inequality like in those other cities? Similar?
Anyway - what's income inequality like in those other cities? Similar?