People use "this begs the question" to mean "this begs [you to ask] the question", and while it's not historically correct accurate, it's modern usage.
People 100 years ago would have thought that Americans using "mad" to mean "angry" instead of "crazy" was equally reckless.
It's not a useful phrase, because nobody knows what it means, and the words "begging the question" themselves don't make sense as a description of the fallacy.
So we've lost (past tense) a part of the vocabulary -- no one knows what it means anymore, but that's okay because it clearly wasn't useful for communicating the idea in question, since nobody knows what it means.
It could be that part of the reason why no one knows what it means anymore is that, at least in my case, the definition of the word 'beg' does not give any intuition about the meaning of the logical fallacy.
I have read the Wikipedia article and I understand what the fallacy is, but for the life of me I cannot stretch my imagination enough to accommodate how "begging the question" fits into it.
When I hear "begging the question" I immediately think of the abstract idea of someone actually begging a question for something. When I read about the logical fallacy, it sounds like it comes from "request for the beginning or premise". In my mind, the phrase should then be "begging for the question" which is still a stretch, but at least I can conceptualize it.
Therefore, it always takes me quite a few cycles to remember what "begging the question" really means because of the complete lack of intuitiveness. I also found this to be true for the term "dynamic programming".
If anyone could explain a better intuition for this phrase, I would greatly appreciate it.
If anyone could explain a better intuition for this phrase, I would greatly appreciate it.
Consider the example from wikipedia:
Person 1: He is mad right now.
Person 2: How do you know?
Person 1: Well, because he is really angry.
If you think of it in terms of the meaning of beg as evade, then Person 1 is begging the inquiry of Person 2. She is evading it by restating the premise.
Words have to make sense separately from what they mean? Maybe you're saying that the phrase doesn't mean the same thing as the literal meaning of the words? What about all the other phrases that mean something apart from the literal meaning of the words; would you have us stop using them, as well? :)
I know what it means and the words describe the fallacy very well. One simple way to describe the fallacy is an attempt to answer a question by trying to squeeze information from the question rather than providing the new information the question asks for. Thus, one begs the question for information.
It's not a useful phrase, because nobody knows what it means
The fact that language evolves is no excuse to just randomly mangle and distort it. English isn't even my native language and I bloody know what it means.
This is not only historically inaccurate but it is currently inaccurate. The fact that a lot of not very smart people use it does not mean we should add it to the language.
I am usually not a stickler for these things, but this is very important because the actually correct phrase "begging the question" has a very specific meaning which is very difficult to convey in other words. Thus, if we allow a bunch of idiots to hijack this phrase in their hopeless quest to sound intelligent, we will lose a very useful phrase for which there is no present substitute.
