Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> It's a huge, profitable, conflict of interest to have your content provider also be the internet signal provider to your home

So why isn't it prohibited on the antitrust grounds? Or they can't be sustainable as separate companies?




Lobbying? There are probably a lot of entrenched interests that don't want the ISP/TV provider monopoly to go away. I guess for TV, there are actually 3 to 4 options available for most people (Dish Network/DirectTV/Cable/Fiber). But for broadband, there is usually only 1 option, or 2 if you're lucky, and they also happen to be selling you content.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: