Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I'm still optimistic that we'll support RFC 6275 before we're all dead.



I for one hope that I won't need to support it after I'm dead.


Let's assume for a moment that RFC6725 is implemented in pacemakers or artificial organs. How long after death would/should these devices remain active? could we use Mobile ipv6 to communicate with the recently-departed loved ones to send final well-wishes?


Let us assume the moon is made of cheese. Now let's discuss the feasibility of a cheese-mining colony there.

I, for one, look forward to communicating with a deceased person's gallbladder.


https://warosu.org/data/vr/img/0014/96/1395782839524.jpg

Perhaps replying with a non-sequitor is why you were downvoted?


In other words, perhaps more seriously: If your initial assumption doesn't make sense, then the whole argument is nonsensical.


Maybe you can explain why implementing RFC6725 in pacemakers and other artificial organs doesn't make sense?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: