If their "tech" and "non-tech" categories are what they sound like, then you're right. Their "tech" category is still 80% male, and 54% + 23% white plus Asian. For such a hip company, they look just as bad as their competitors.
Serious Question(s): How does this make them look bad? Is it unfair to think that this happens to be because of the demographic of people interested and qualified in "tech" positions? Or should we genuinely think these numbers are lopsided for some nefarious reasons?
