Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No, because this is not a case of A vs. B. It's A vs. all the Bs, Cs, Ds, &c patenting stuff.

So sure, a company building a battery has a good chance of coming up with an enforceable patent. But given thousands of people trying to patent battery-ish ideas and many that aren't immediately related to batteries, the odds favour one of them coming up with something that receives a patent and is vaguely related to whatever the battery manufacturer is doing.

Remember, a patent is a sword but not a shield. Just because you patent an idea and make something with that idea, you cannot assume that nobody else has a patent that applies to your "patented" idea. They may have patented some other part of the process for manufacturing your "invention" or they may have a patent for an underlying component of your process even though you have patented a novel way to apply their patented idea.

Please let go of the idea that patenting something is a license to actually do something tangible with your idea. It is not: It is actually a license to interfere with other people doing something with your idea.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: