Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Your view is certainly not the same as the way many people view Kickstarter.

My view is based on things like Kickstarter's terms of service and contract law.

And the complaints about failed delivery of rewards indicate that it is also consistent with the way many backers see Kickstarter.

Certainly, I can see why each individual project team would like the idea of getting funding without giving up either equity or an obligation to pay money later (as they would in traditional financing) or an obligation to provide product (as they would in a preorder, or in Kickstarters existing terms if they offer the product as a reward), while still using the product as an inducement.

> There is obviously a lot of value in having some kind of market where people hand over money with the risk of project failure, in order to potentially get a new product that they want to exist built.

And Kickstarter can be that without product-as-reward -- after all, if the project is for a product to be offered to the public, people who back the project can "potentially get" the product (contingent on project success) when it is offered to the public.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: