Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
AutoIt and Malware: What’s the Connection? (mcafee.com)
18 points by edne on July 5, 2014 | hide | past | favorite | 1 comment



I've used AutoIt fairly heavily in the past and can say from experience that, in many ways, it is indeed very convenient for rapid Windows development.

Still, to more directly answer the "question" presented in the article title, I'd say that there is no connection between AutoIt and malware -- at least no more than any other malware authors' languages of choice. It's unfortunate for legitimate developers that malware authors (unsurprisingly) find the convenience to work for them as well. That doesn't excuse anti-malware vendors for labeling executables as malware just because they were developed using AutoIt. The UPX packing that comes out-of-the-box with the AutoIt "compiler" doesn't help either -- it's like a one-two combo for false-positives, since anti-malware software also frequently get tripped up by EXE packers like UPX.

AutoIt-based stuff that I've distributed in the past have fallen victim to AutoIt+UPX false-positives, and it's teeth-grindingly annoying for your stuff to be perfectly fine for a long stretch of time, only to find people knocking on your e-door the next day grilling you about distributing malware just because the anti-malware vendors updated their signatures to block AutoIt -- again.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: