ServiceWorkers and Firefox

[rnyman]

https://hacks.mozilla.org/2014/06/serviceworkers-and-firefox/

[aikah]

So it's basically an https proxy server running on the client in a worker thread that can work offline right?

[SimeVidas → aikah]

Sounds about right :)

[derefr]

So, like the HTML5 Application Cache, but actually useful.

[th3iedkid]

Is there any work on having something like HTML5 lite with a lighter browser implementation?Because things like these call for more devices(sockets) to used , which takes more resourceful computers to accomplish.Is there any work on actually reducing the browser foot-print , right from spec level?

[dccoolgai]

This is exciting. I don't track too many of these standards efforts closely, but I've been following this one for a while. I honestly think that offline-first will do more to close the gap with native than anything.

[technological]

Are web workers,any way related to service workers ??

[wereHamster → technological]

Read this overview: http://jakearchibald.com/2014/service-worker-first-draft/

[walterbell → wereHamster]

> It's like having a proxy server running on the client

Is that "proxy server" under the control of the client or the origin site? e.g. can it perform content transformation? That post talks mostly about offline caching, are there other use cases driving the proposal?

[rictic → walterbell]

It's under the control of the origin site (for client manipulation there are stable extension apis in most browsers for this already).

The primary use case is caching and offline / partial connectivity, but it's full javascript and the service worker can construct arbitrary responses.

Here's a good overview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uQMl7mFB6g