Open source is/was never about the money. It's about the freedom of having the source. The license is pretty easy and simple if you distribute your modified soft with the same open source licence.
The concept of the gpl is: I show you my code, if you show me yours. It's about sharing and repriocity.
It's not about snatching the nice tools built by the community, putting a nice gui layer and some extra features on it and closing the source. The fastest way for our friend here to adhere to the license is dropping ffmpeg or releasing his code as gpl. He doesn't seem to be willing to do that.
How would you like people who copy your sourcecode without permission and sell it to anyone?
The concept of the gpl is: I show you my code, if you show me yours. It's about sharing and repriocity.
It's not about snatching the nice tools built by the community, putting a nice gui layer and some extra features on it and closing the source. The fastest way for our friend here to adhere to the license is dropping ffmpeg or releasing his code as gpl. He doesn't seem to be willing to do that.
How would you like people who copy your sourcecode without permission and sell it to anyone?