Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

natural gas as a replacement for coal-fired power does help, though. it helps a lot.



In terms of total emissions, no we are doing much worse. Many, many gas wells crack and poisons the land and releases enormous amounts of gases hundreds times worse than CO2.

In terms of total pollution, it removes the vast majority toxic waste produced by coal which kills many people. Not to mention the mercury levels in the ocean it's causing.

WE really needed advanced technologies like Nuclear Energy in the face of virtually a coal/gas apocalypse. We are now in serious jeopardy without it. Why do you think China's making Nuclear energy such a massive initiative? Even India is doing decent research on them because they're sitting on a pile of thorium.

This isn't a problem that we can be gambling with. We only get one good try at this because there will be tens of thousands of years of repercussions. The fact that we're settling with "good enough" on this could mean millions will be displaced & billions of people could starve to death. All because we're being controlled by a greedy gov, greedier lobbyists & a population too stupid to do the right thing.


No - see "US Coal Exports Erode All CO2 Savings from Shale Gas" http://co2scorecard.org/home/researchitem/29

The gas lobby is really powerful in the US, and it's critical to get this myth busted.

(And doubly "no", see the sibling comment)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: