Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The longer an organism lives the more it can reproduce, the more copies of it's genes there will be. Any gene that increases (reproductive) lifespan is strongly selected for.



Not correct, though intuitive. Consider each offspring to be 50% of the genes of the parent. A parent with three children is competing with hir own genetics, and losing.


Your reasoning makes no sense. If the parent can live longer they can reproduce more and therefore propagate more of their genes.


It does. 150% (more than the parent) of the genes have teamed up with a foreign 150% of genes against the parent.


It seems like the rate of reproduction rather than total reproductive lifespan is what matters for selection. A longer lifespan at the expense of a lower rate of reproduction would not be selected for.


I don't see any reason why this would require that tradeoff.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: