a. They get money for: 1) Each patent claim (a patent is made up of a number of claims); 2) Each patent issued; 3) maintenance fees on granted patents; 4) Any extensions or continuations requested by the applicant; 5) Any post-rejection amendments.
At their annual review, one measure of how hard an examiner worked is probably based on how many requests they dealt with appropriately, whether that's 5 requests for 1 patent, or 1 request each for 5 patents.
Using a measure like the one you described is like using number of Lines of Code in a programmer's annual review.
It is in no one's interest for an examiner to simply stamp "PASSED" on any application that arrives on his desk.
b. Examiners can send it back for clarification, but if the applicant needs more than the allotted time to clarify, then that attracts a fee.
c. Part of the money goes to the lawyers, some of the money goes to IRS. It is a weak incentive, but not no incentive at all.
At their annual review, one measure of how hard an examiner worked is probably based on how many requests they dealt with appropriately, whether that's 5 requests for 1 patent, or 1 request each for 5 patents.
Using a measure like the one you described is like using number of Lines of Code in a programmer's annual review.
It is in no one's interest for an examiner to simply stamp "PASSED" on any application that arrives on his desk.
b. Examiners can send it back for clarification, but if the applicant needs more than the allotted time to clarify, then that attracts a fee.
c. Part of the money goes to the lawyers, some of the money goes to IRS. It is a weak incentive, but not no incentive at all.