The article says nothing about the funding stopping completely, just funding a new round, hence my edit which originally said stop funding, which is incorrect.
I'm not sure what is difficult to understand here about the main point that the title is inaccurate - there wasn't even an attempt to refute the explanation.
I'm not sure what is difficult to understand here about the main point that the title is inaccurate - there wasn't even an attempt to refute the explanation.