Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> the Court didn't conclude that he wasn't guilty

Part of their justification for vacating based on venue was that a proper venue very likely would have resulted in different charges or verdict.




Where in the opinion does the Court say that? If they did, it would be a serious procedural error that would likely be overruled on appeal. A court cannot take substantive issues into account (other than where the alleged activity took place) when determining whether venue is proper.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: