Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

In the comments: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/08/self-enforcing...

someone brings up the situation where there is only one item (Grandma's antique mirror) and how you can use the shotgun clause to determine who gets the item.

I'm reminded of the chapter (70) in Cryptonomicon where they were dividing the assets of an estate. All of the children got to rank items on 2 scales, emotional attachment and dollar value. The choices on both axes were scaled to between 0 and 1. Then they were going to use software to determine an equal split on both scales amongst all recipients.




And Stephenson then went on to mention, through Randy and his uncle (or was it his father?) that the problem itself was incredibly difficult, and they were going to borrow some time on a huge machine to solve it.

And then Randy cheated, anyway.


> The choices on both axes were scaled to between 0 and 1.

That I don't remember, but I do remember that they had sex on one of the furniture items in question :)


different chapter (41) and it was Tom Howard, not Randy who had sex on a Gomer Bolstrood dresser.

(The reason I can quote chapters is that I have an OCR'ed scan of the book that I found on the internet. a quick search on the word 'stockings' found the right chapter.)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: