Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is absurdly reductionist.



Assume for a moment that I don't know what you mean by 'reductionist'; why is it wrong?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductionism[#]

In other words, you by failing to distinguish scaling phenomena (1->N) with a gating criteria (0,1), you are making an attribution error concerning the "essentialness" of your explanatory variable.

For example: co-founders are typically not "interviewed" for the job. But (a) their selection is essential; and (b) if you can find a co-founder, you can find any lesser employee.

It could be argued, that having the ability to "recruit" without formal interview is actually a more essential skill.


Better than absurdly pompous...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: