Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> (which, as you might be aware, is Open Source)

Being open source has never been an excuse to break the standards process. It's disheartening to see open source being used to justify this behavior again (first with PNaCl, now this).




That's moving the goalposts. The full context of your statement was:

> it'll be other vendors' pain as they have to reverse engineer Blink's implementation

Which was the salient point I was replying to. Quoting out of context to imply I made statements I did not is...disheartening.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: