Curried Javascript Functions

[ccarpenterg]

http://javascript.crockford.com/www_svendtofte_com/code/curried_javascript/index.html

[apu]

If you already know all about higher-order programming and just want a javascript library with all the haskell/ML-style goodness, I highly recommend O. Steele's Functional library: http://osteele.com/sources/javascript/functional/

If nothing else, then his lambda() implementation with strings should be enough to convince you to use it.

[jganetsk]

Here's an implementation that I think is shorter, simpler to understand, easier to use, and doesn't require modifying existing functions for currification

  function curry(fn) {
    var wrappedFnMaker = function(accArgs) {
        return function() {
            var effectiveArgs = accArgs.concat(Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments));
            if (effectiveArgs.length >= fn.length) {
                return fn.apply(this, effectiveArgs);
            } else {
                return wrappedFnMaker(effectiveArgs);
            }
        };
    }
    return wrappedFnMaker([]);
  }

  add = curry(function(a,b,c) { return a + b + c; });

[marcmarc → jganetsk]

Here's my take:

  function curry(fn, args) {
    if (typeof args == "undefined" || args.length < fn.length)
      return function() {
	if (typeof args == "undefined")
	  args = [];
	return curry(fn, args.concat(Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments)));
      };
    return fn.apply(this, args);
  }
  var add = curry(function(a, b, c) { return a + b + c;});

[shaunxcode → marcmarc]

Here is curry in php 5.3

  function curry(){
    $args = func_get_args();
    $fn = array_shift($args);
    return function() use(&$fn, &$args) {
        $nargs = func_get_args();
        foreach($nargs as $narg) $args[] = $narg;
        return call_user_func_array($fn, $args);
    };
  }

  $add20 = curry(function($a, $b){return $a + $b;}, 20);

  echo $add20(5); #25

[jganetsk → marcmarc]

Both of our implementations have broken this. Damn you, Javascript this.

In principle, these two lines of code should always produce the same result:

  foo.bar(1,2)

and

  foo.bar(1)(2)

And they won't necessarily in our case, if the function uses this.

[bodhi]

What's the deal with the stuff in the footer of this page? "The original page disappeared a couple of years ago. This is an unauthorized copy." It links to http://www.svendtofte.com/code/curried_javascript/ which I guess is the original article?

[troels]

Oldie but goodie. If you liked that, you might like this too: [Higher Order Programming in Javascript](http://w3future.com/html/stories/hop.xml)

[axod]

Currying looks horrible IMHO. It's like goto but worse. Can anyone give a real life example of why it's useful or desired?

[ilyak]

Prototype has curry() and bind() methods on functions for some time.

http://prototypejs.org/api/function

String.prototype.splitOnSpaces = String.prototype.split.curry(" "); "foo bar baz thud".splitOnSpaces(); //-> ["foo", "bar", "baz", "thud"]

[lhorie → ilyak]

This:

  "foo bar baz thud".splitOnSpaces(); //-> ["foo", "bar", "baz", "thud"]

can be written like this:

  $w("foo bar baz thud")