Why doesn't it count as trafficking in stolen property? The documents weren't leaked, they were stolen. They are not "confidential", they are stolen property.
Yes, this is what Michael is pointing out and he is somewhat right. Otherwise, if something negative leaks out of the company, they might just call it confidential and nobody could publish it...
But seriously, how is this in any way legal? I almost can't believe it, it seems like a hoax...