This is basically a ploy by someone who is seeking publicity for his attack on this other individual by taking his words out of context and altering their meaning.
His is a repost under another date of the same bat-shit crazy "nothing" that makes Gawker seem reasonable.
The author is an attention monger who probably has some sort of a personal vendetta against the person he is attacking, I suggest not to take his account of things on face value.
Here is a previous submission of HN of the disputed post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6984487
http://www.firstlooksy.com/frustrated-googler-speaks-out-on-...
His is a repost under another date of the same bat-shit crazy "nothing" that makes Gawker seem reasonable.
The author is an attention monger who probably has some sort of a personal vendetta against the person he is attacking, I suggest not to take his account of things on face value.