Didn't someone debunk all this in the last thread? That it turned out there was only one person (coincidentally the most vocal one) who claimed that analytics showed that their stuff had not been looked at? Did you have new info or are you just parroting etc.?
Well, it's accepted at this point that no one had their apps run. Which I understand giving the judging mechanism (you submit it and they look at it vs they walk around and you show it to them). They said as much in their press release. The final 5 were chosen based on descriptions and videos alone.
Now, very few people can confirm that they had no views of their videos because most people watched it themselves several times and/or shared the link. One person claims they had zero views on the video, which isn't a very good sample size. We had 18 views of our video by the time judging ended and we had 16 before it started, but whether those two were by judges or by people we shared with, I have no idea. Either way, it wasn't viewed multiple times by many different judges as we've been told.
