What's the purpose of your reply, exactly? To me, it seems perfectly reasonable to criticize and evaluate a potentially unfair ruling in a large, notable competition.
Now that Salesforce has given their response, it should be evaluated just like any other company statement, to see if it is accurate and meets the community standards of what's "fair". Yes, fairness is partially subjective, which is why people want to discuss it here.
Now that Salesforce has given their response, it should be evaluated just like any other company statement, to see if it is accurate and meets the community standards of what's "fair". Yes, fairness is partially subjective, which is why people want to discuss it here.