Yes, it's likely that an actual water supply could be a target for an easement, mainly because it's the only method of either transportation or sustaining someone's livelihood/life in a desert climate.
Even if the internet 'needed' to be used, the only easement you could claim would be on the equipment of the telco in order to access something over the telco's property [that you could not otherwise access]. There are multiple methods to gain internet access, and the internet is not a requirement of a property or method of access (unless telephones and postal mail become abolished), and does not affect your property.
I don't see what any of this has to do with political philosophy. The law is the law; doesn't much matter what you label it.
Even if the internet 'needed' to be used, the only easement you could claim would be on the equipment of the telco in order to access something over the telco's property [that you could not otherwise access]. There are multiple methods to gain internet access, and the internet is not a requirement of a property or method of access (unless telephones and postal mail become abolished), and does not affect your property.
I don't see what any of this has to do with political philosophy. The law is the law; doesn't much matter what you label it.