| I made a mistake myself when I used the label “open source tea party” to refer to the vocal non-technical critics of work that Canonical does
He's still sticking with labelling vocal technical critics as the open source tea party. Just read it carefully once again.
| That was unnecessary and quite possibly equally offensive to members of the real Tea Party (hi there!) and the people with vocal non-technical criticism of work that Canonical does
| Please accept my apologies if you have been a vocal non-technical critic of Canonical’s software and felt offended by the label
Well this non-apology apology completely insults the intelligence of anyone reading it.
| I made a mistake myself when I used the label “open source tea party” to refer to the vocal non-technical critics of work that Canonical does
He's still sticking with labelling vocal technical critics as the open source tea party. Just read it carefully once again.
| That was unnecessary and quite possibly equally offensive to members of the real Tea Party (hi there!) and the people with vocal non-technical criticism of work that Canonical does
| Please accept my apologies if you have been a vocal non-technical critic of Canonical’s software and felt offended by the label
Well this non-apology apology completely insults the intelligence of anyone reading it.
Edit: Formatting