On: Clang is now feature complete for C++14

[cokernel_hacker]

libcxx has not only implemented C++14 but they have also implemented all known defect reports at roughly the rate they get published!

http://libcxx.llvm.org/cxx1y_status.html

[mekishizufu → cokernel_hacker]

Unfortunately libc++ is fully supported on Mac OSX only, with ports on their way. I actually use libc++ on linux but there're still some things that need to be fixed. [1]

[1] http://libcxx.llvm.org/results.Linux.html

[cokernel_hacker → mekishizufu]

Those results are from over a year ago [1].

[1] http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=1...

[mekishizufu → cokernel_hacker]

Good point. I will run the tests myself to see the current status.

[eonil → cokernel_hacker]

I still see the cuchar fail on Clang source 3.3, but maybe different on trunk.

[X-Istence → mekishizufu]

Not just Mac OS X, it is in the FreeBSD base system by default, it is the replacement for the libstdc++. See FreeBSD 10 where the switch was made :-).

[eonil → mekishizufu]

Doesn't it run on FreeBSD?

[0x09 → eonil]

David Chisnall likes to point out that it actually passes more of its test suite on FreeBSD than on OS X.

edit: thanks misframer

[preetamjinka → 0x09]

Chisnall

[eliben → mekishizufu]

That's not entirely true. libc++ works on Linux too. In fact, Google's PNaCl has experimental libc++ support that's completely cross-platform.

[pmelendez → eliben]

And in windows too http://llvm.org/builds/

[fedvasu → eliben]

yeah right. It is beta-quality unfit for pre-packaging in distro's. ABI incompatible with libstdcxx and deliberately OS X only. (It works sure (i mean kinda) no one is actually a linux port developer or maintainer not yet)