Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
erichocean
on Oct 8, 2013
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Optimizing Linux Memory Management for Low-latency...
I understood it to mean that it had 1/4 the error rates they were previously seeing.
dllthomas
on Oct 8, 2013
|
next
[–]
Huh, that's not even one I considered. I guessed 1/5, so the
change
was 4x the final value. Either way it's wrong - "dropped by X%" should be calculated as (original - final) / original.
apurvamehta
on Oct 8, 2013
|
prev
[–]
This is exactly right :)
caf
on Oct 8, 2013
|
parent
[–]
Then it dropped by 75%.
apurvamehta
on Oct 8, 2013
|
root
|
parent
[–]
Yes. It was a blunder. The post has been updated to reflect this.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: