> many muslim immigrants refuse to assimilate to the point of wanting to be governed by separate sets of laws
That's a tiny minority of the UK's immigrant community. Drawing general conclusions from such an unrepresentative sample is intellectually dishonest. It's the kind of argument seized upon by hate-mongers.
Just go ahead and pretend that this is not a bomb ready to go off in about 10-30 years when the minority becomes the majority.
Then ignore facts and basic crime stats, dangerous religious views being encouraged, increases in violence and hostility, the formation of no-go zones, active tribalism practices amongst the immigrant groups even passed the 3rd generation, rejection of democracy, etc.
Pretend those are all just figments of our imagination.
Then use words like "racist" and "hate-monger" towards anyone that does not subscribe to your fiction.
The truth is a badly implemented immigration policy based on false premises dose nothing but change a society with a few miserable people to a society completely full of miserable people (on both sides - native and non-native).
It does not even matter it is only a "minority"...
It takes 100s of people, and 1000s of man-years, to construct a building.
It takes 1 person 5 minutes and 1 gallon of gasoline to burn that building down.
You are seriously quoting The Centre for Social Cohesion (now merged with the Henry Jackson Society - a "neocon think tank" which is connected with that epitome of rational thought, "The Committee on the Present Danger") and the Daily Mail (which needs no introduction)?
One third of British Muslim students say they support killing for Islam. What about their actions, though? Cognitive dissonance is pretty common among religious people. A lot of Christians agree with the statement, "If your right eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away", but there still aren't many actual eye-gouging cases.
> many muslim immigrants refuse to assimilate to the point of wanting to be governed by separate sets of laws
That's a tiny minority of the UK's immigrant community. Drawing general conclusions from such an unrepresentative sample is intellectually dishonest. It's the kind of argument seized upon by hate-mongers.