Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The co-working trial is a two way street. Wouldn't a good developer want to make sure the new co-workers are also good?



Hiring has always been a two way street, but in technology the scales are usually tipped against the hiring company. It's simply a numbers game -- there are far more mediocre and poor developers than good ones, and in the current environment, the good ones can basically get hired to work wherever they want.

The co-working trial is an attempt to make the scale more favorable for the company. I can understand the desire for this, but in the current environment, it's almost guaranteed to backfire, as the best developers simply won't put up with it. No amount of wishful thinking on the part of the company is going to change this.


I've worked at a few places that hire top level engineers and use this tactic. It seems to be very successful.

As a developer, why wouldn't you want to see what the codebase and your coworkers are like in a real environment - and get paid for doing it?

Worst case scenario: you wasted a day of vacation, got paid a consultant rate for it while still getting vacation pay from your "real" job.


> I can understand the desire for this, but in the current environment, it's almost guaranteed to backfire, as the best developers simply won't put up with it.

An awful lot of developers are willing to put up with inane algorithm tests.

If I was hiring, I'd be skeptical of any developer who would prefer five hours of whiteboarding to some sort of trial arrangement, or even a sufficiently complete take-home coding test that is similar in nature to the work they'd be performing as an employee.


>If I was hiring, I'd be skeptical of any developer who would prefer five hours of whiteboarding to some sort of trial arrangement,

In theory I would prefer the trial arrangement, but in practice, if I'm employed, it's not an option unless I'm totally and absolutely convinced that you run the perfect company for me.

Which you probably do not.

If I'm unemployed and searching for a job (which sometimes happens: I like to take 6 month long holidays between leaving an old job and starting a new one), then I think it's a fantastic idea. Provided it is paid.


> ...it's not an option unless I'm totally and absolutely convinced that you run the perfect company for me...Which you probably do not.

If you're employed and seeking employment elsewhere, for whatever reason, why would you even waste your time interviewing with a company that you didn't think had the potential to be a very good fit?


I wouldn't of course.

But doing 3 day long interviews means 1/4 of my holiday for the year is gone. On ONE company. Who may not even want to hire me.

3 more of those and I don't get to see a beach until 2015.


I haven't personally done a trial arrangement, but it's definitely intriguing. I absolutely loathe the 5 hour whiteboarding tests whenever I have to do them, and usually I end up fretting about it the day before and show up having not slept an iota.

Different strokes, I suppose.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: