Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

For me, the key point of the article is that the board asked,

How can you be that far off what consumers want? Was it that you're not listening to your team? Was it because the team was afraid to give him advice? Was it because the team saw a different reality? Or was it that the team lacked the skill set to anticipate the failure?

I believe they are realizing that there is a culture at Microsoft that is holding back the company.




It doesn't say anywhere that the board asked that. That was a quote from this Patrick Moorhead, "principal analyst with Moor Insights & Strategy."

The entire basis of this article is that guy's speculation. Is there any reason to believe he has any real insight into the situation? I'm kind of ready to file this under "bullshit speculation/self-promotion of some random 'analyst.'"


> Is there any reason to believe he has any real insight into the situation?

His hypothesis fits the observation. IMHO, it fits better than the official "Ballmer got bored, decided to quit" explanation.


The board didn't ask that, some analyst asked that. This article is mostly speculation and Kreliminology, so read it with a grain of salt.


This. I cannot believe the board gave him such an amazing amount of rope, for so very long, and they are just coming to ask those questions.

I wonder what they thought the problem was?




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: