Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I hope that if I'm ever a CEO, I'll have the decency to point out that while I am friendly, I am not a friend.



Keep in mind that I run a couple of small but growing businesses and have worked for major corporations.

One thing I would point out is that in my experience the people who are laid off in a company advance their careers and those who remain stagnate. I am not sure I would put this in a layoff email though.

If times are tough, I still think that layoffs are a real last resort. Your best assets are the entrepreneurs in your business and these can be floor-level employees. The rule breakers, the ones who will fight the system or break the rules in order to do a better job are the ones that need to be paid well, not in terms of money but in terms of owning their job (and ideally a share of profits).


In Australia I've seen two common patterns:

1. Reducing hours by X% instead of sacking X% of employees.

2. Offering voluntary redundancy packages.

Option 1 tends to lead to some people quitting anyhow.

Option 2 has the problem that it can dramaticaly exacerbate the Dead Sea problem. Anyone with any pep grabs the package and looks for a job elsewhere.


In either case if companies need to cut back, then the best people will leave first, since they have more options.


michaelochurch do agree, but emphasizes that they need to be done correctly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: