Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's unlimited for personal use. Running a server is not usually considered "personal use", unless it's a personal server, which I'd presume they would allow.



Then advertise it as such:

"Gigabit Internet, in short bursts, and only if you are using your connection like a consumer (as we define the term)!"

I guess that does not have quite the same ring to it...


Let's ban Google from advertising a "search" product while we're at it, as the product they actually provide is much more complex than the term does justice.

Let's also ban them from advertising a "mail" service, because they should also have to specify the exact nature of the POP3/IMAP/SMTP service provided right there in the headline, along with all the fair use restrictions.

This is asinine pedantry. Nobody is mistaking Google's residential and business Internet connection offerings. The terms and conditions are clearly stated, and it's fairly obvious to users if they are breaching the fair use policy.


I don't know why, but for some reason when ever this issue comes up, this site likes to go into full on ignorant mode and pretend we don't know what the difference between personal and business class is.

Most people find bandwidth charges by the gigabyte distasteful, hence no payments based on that. Don't run a warez ftp site on your personal connection and you will be fine. Worried you might be hitting their upper limit of usage on what their definition of "personal use" is? Fine then just start out of the gate by paying more for business class. It is really straightforward.


If the pedants had their way, service providers would be banned from providing contended Internet connections with fair usage policies, and everyone would have to shell out for uncontended services.


I know what "business" means.

I know what "server" technically means, but Google is explicitly not using the technical definition of server.

I'm not using an 'ignorant mode'. Google's TOS is thoroughly broken until they provide some definition of the word server.


Google can't and won't use a technical definition of server. It would be impossible and easy to work around if they iterated out every thing they believe constitutes a "server". The law and language is purposefully vague and is left open to interpretation.

Let's define server as something that is going to be using up enough traffic/bandwidth to get you noticed and degrades service for someone else on your network segment. That could be saturating your connection 24/7 on a network segment that is heavily utilized, or not even an issue if you live in Bumville, Nowhere.

This is something which will never be technically spelled out because it is all about context.


They could at least provide guidelines.

Right now I seriously have no idea if a legal, non-commercial instance of apache averaging 50kbps and peaking at 5mbps is going to violate their rules or not.

If they said it had to be enough bandwidth to affect others then I could breathe a sigh of relief that I'm fine.


> If they said it had to be enough bandwidth to affect others then I could breathe a sigh of relief that I'm fine.

How are you going to ensure you aren't bothering others? They aren't going to give you access to their NOC so you can view their TP99 performance and see if you are a culprit. This service could be not anything to worry about in network segment A, but a large issue in segment B. It can't be broadly defined as a simple flat metric and apply to every neighborhood in the country.

If you are worried about the case above I think the choices would be: Buy a personal connection, run your service and worry about running afoul, don't run your service and be happy with a personal connection, run your service with a business account from the start and don't be worried.


Are you suggesting that they would lie to me or that they would be so incompetent that my apache instance using less bandwidth than streaming radio would affect my neighbor's gigabit line?

I'm assuming some basic levels of competence and a reluctance to flat-out lie when I complain about a provision that can be used to boot people on a whim.

I shouldn't need a business account unless I want a better service level or I'm running a business.


I'm not sure about any lying, and it sounds like you already know the answer to your own question. If you think you are running a server/service that violates their TOS for a personal account, then buy a business account, or don't, and worry about getting a C&D letter. You are never going to get a technical iteration of everything that constitutes a "server" from any ISP.


> If you think you are running a server/service that violates their TOS for a personal account

That's the problem. I have no clue whatsoever if it would violate their TOS. The TOS is so vague as to be meaningless when it comes to figuring out if a noncommercial use is banned or not.

Whether a rule is vague is not binary. They can leave themselves some wiggle room while still providing rules that can be understood.


...But it is being defined. Right here:

Your Google Fiber account is for your use and the reasonable use of your guests. Unless you have a written agreement with Google Fiber permitting you do so, you should not host any type of server using your Google Fiber connection, use your Google Fiber account to provide a large number of people with Internet access, or use your Google Fiber account to provide commercial services to third parties (including, but not limited to, selling Internet access to third parties).

If that isn't good enough for you I guess either buy business class and be happy you are in compliance, or don't.


No, it's not being defined.

>Your Google Fiber account is for your use and the reasonable use of your guests. Unless you have a written agreement with Google Fiber permitting you do so, you should not

Okay, introduction.

>host any type of server using your Google Fiber connection,

Server is not defined. It says 'any type' but this is blatantly incorrect, as the FAQ says you are permitted game servers, videoconferencing serving, etc.

>use your Google Fiber account to provide a large number of people with Internet access,

Okay no subleasing, that's reasonable and clear.

> or use your Google Fiber account to provide commercial services to third parties (including, but not limited to, selling Internet access to third parties).

That all falls under commercial, fine.

Note that nowhere does it actually explain what I can and can't do non-commercially. It only says a single thing is banned, 'server', but server is somewhere between not-defined and incorrectly-defined.

The commercial restrictions are clear. The restriction against using the household internet on more than a household or so is clear. The restrictions on what you can do non-commercially are insultingly vague.


where is the line between personal and non-personal? why can't i just have a number of GB?


Common sense tends to prevail.

Are you hosting a personal file server that shifts ~20GB/month with the odd FTP connection, or a major website shifting 1TB/month with thousands of concurrent HTTP connections?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: