Since I am leading my efforts into a reading/translating/communicating toolkit I find this very interesting, and personally useful (I need people to share their opinions like that):
* There is no documentation
My code is not documented, then again I am using the principle idea behind __doc__: Code IS documentation, and I've decided to blend the difference between code, document, and even data.
* There is no desktop version
My road-map includes a core frame, which has Presentations for Terminal, GUI desktop, and webby version of it (html, css, js, ...)... um yeah... Presentations, Control, Model (model slice, inner model slice, perspectives, view-points): PCM (Present, Control, Model)
* There is no Next button!
The main web reader I plan to provide, has a Letterbox layout, with next: (chapter, page, etc.)
prev: (...), bookmark-tags (alabala bla bla [: some name for the BM])
* + Sequential Layout-ing:
Instead of even touching the buttons or mouse, you let the "AI" helper (Wordy) to blurt it out on the terminal paragraph, by paragraph, sentence by sentence, word by word, with tempo and optional "accenting"... Just like a kid listening to his father telling stories. You have the option of speeding up the tempo, or simply push it forward
* +Convo-trees
Trees of Conversations (Documents outputed and printed)
This is highly wondorous tool which I still conceptualize with the following scenario:
You are a Weed Farmer with A blog, mail, etc.
You want to communicate with your prospective buyers, but you don't want cops in your clientele.
Therefore, you decided to place a mail on the site, and only after an interview, you decide whether the seeker is a sincere buyer or a cop (or interviewer) under cover.
So you have those repetitive tedious interviews with common answers and such, and you WANT
to automagicate the process a bit.
What if you put Wordy behind the mail-server and make it redirect things it can't respond to,
to your advanced intellect? Nice?
may be. Depends on Wordy.
...
The rest of the arguments OP presents are technical hiccups rather than poor user interface design mal-techniques (choice of paradigms)
* There is no documentation
My code is not documented, then again I am using the principle idea behind __doc__: Code IS documentation, and I've decided to blend the difference between code, document, and even data.
* There is no desktop version
My road-map includes a core frame, which has Presentations for Terminal, GUI desktop, and webby version of it (html, css, js, ...)... um yeah... Presentations, Control, Model (model slice, inner model slice, perspectives, view-points): PCM (Present, Control, Model)
* There is no Next button!
The main web reader I plan to provide, has a Letterbox layout, with next: (chapter, page, etc.) prev: (...), bookmark-tags (alabala bla bla [: some name for the BM])
* + Sequential Layout-ing:
Instead of even touching the buttons or mouse, you let the "AI" helper (Wordy) to blurt it out on the terminal paragraph, by paragraph, sentence by sentence, word by word, with tempo and optional "accenting"... Just like a kid listening to his father telling stories. You have the option of speeding up the tempo, or simply push it forward
* +Convo-trees
Trees of Conversations (Documents outputed and printed)
This is highly wondorous tool which I still conceptualize with the following scenario: You are a Weed Farmer with A blog, mail, etc. You want to communicate with your prospective buyers, but you don't want cops in your clientele. Therefore, you decided to place a mail on the site, and only after an interview, you decide whether the seeker is a sincere buyer or a cop (or interviewer) under cover.
So you have those repetitive tedious interviews with common answers and such, and you WANT to automagicate the process a bit.
What if you put Wordy behind the mail-server and make it redirect things it can't respond to, to your advanced intellect? Nice? may be. Depends on Wordy.
... The rest of the arguments OP presents are technical hiccups rather than poor user interface design mal-techniques (choice of paradigms)