HIV testing is largely a fraud, though, as it's conclusions are based on unscientific claims that HIV and AIDS are the same thing or even scientifically proven correlated.
The field is laughable, really. It's sad that people making important decisions in the medical and pharmaceutical fields cannot correctly interpret a confusion matrix, or if they can they are corrupt and decide to ignore it anyway.
You really don't want to apply the same standards to law enforcement, as they are appalling.
EDIT: to the downvoters, I'd suggest doing some reading. In particular, check on the existence of any verifiable testing that proves any semblance of correlation between HIV and AIDS. The standard is appalling for any scientist who's willing to check on the numbers. In general, the standard in medical science is rather low compared to say physics, but in this case it's astonishingly low considering the accolades Montagnier got for his research. I understand it's easy to dismiss this as conspiranoia but it really is not. There are dubious claims passed as truths with very specific interests behind. Not making an assertion either way on the HIV<->AIDS relationship, just pointing out that the standard of the research is shocking and the statistics skills of the people involved are incredibly poor, if not intentionally corrupt.
This is even more pathetic than creationism. This is on par with insisting that the earth is flat. Denial is a hell of a drug.
Using condoms ever killed anybody. Stay save. And if you personally refuse therapy, ok. But HIV does cause AIDS and has a one hundred percent lethality. In case you affected use the remaining time.
You are making a series of stupid assumptions here. Like I'm denying that AIDS kills, or that STDs kill. It's clearly established. Which is why I've always been extremely cautious and I'm healthy as it gets.
The fact that AIDS is virus-induced, that remains unproven. However, it's pandered as such and a number of companies are cashing big on antivirals and antiretrovirals, in many cases worsening the patient's health. To claim something is proven without proof, that is pathetic.
And this is not the only scam induced by big pharma. There are many other perverse effects stemming directly from the fact that pharmaceuticals cash big on chronic illnesses, giving them an incentive to research not in cures, but in long lasting treatments.
Feel free to downvote away though. It's important and downvotes might actually get more people to read it.
The field is laughable, really. It's sad that people making important decisions in the medical and pharmaceutical fields cannot correctly interpret a confusion matrix, or if they can they are corrupt and decide to ignore it anyway.
You really don't want to apply the same standards to law enforcement, as they are appalling.
EDIT: to the downvoters, I'd suggest doing some reading. In particular, check on the existence of any verifiable testing that proves any semblance of correlation between HIV and AIDS. The standard is appalling for any scientist who's willing to check on the numbers. In general, the standard in medical science is rather low compared to say physics, but in this case it's astonishingly low considering the accolades Montagnier got for his research. I understand it's easy to dismiss this as conspiranoia but it really is not. There are dubious claims passed as truths with very specific interests behind. Not making an assertion either way on the HIV<->AIDS relationship, just pointing out that the standard of the research is shocking and the statistics skills of the people involved are incredibly poor, if not intentionally corrupt.