I'm so annoyed. I've heard "tig is amazing" so I go to github... hmm, no screenshots or examples. Oh, there's a homepage. Compile instructions but also no screenshots or examples.
"Tig is a git repository browser that additionally can act as a pager for output from various git commands."
It happens all over github. Even UI projects fall prey to this problem, which is especially egregious. I want to grab these project owners by the shoulders, shake them, and yell DON'T YOU WANT ME TO USE YOUR PROJECT? THEN SHOW ME WTF IT DOES!!
Everytime I think a feature doesn't exist in tig, I search the docs for it... facepalm that I didn't realize it could do that and love it ever so much more.
Off topic, but what's with the trend of not showing dates on blogs/blogging services? Just overlooked or hidden on purpose? Even the comments don't have dates.
Apologies for not responding on this. I am not aware of anything that does this right off... Would probably be pretty easy to script. If you are still interested, I could probably get the basics of this rolling.
Yes, or at least the basename of the file that changed most. I think you can't include filenames using --pretty though, you'd have to write a new script.
My preferences: http://i.imgur.com/UtxK6LZ.png (source in my github/dotfiles; this is suitable mostly for linear history without merges). Displays 10 items by default, for more, I write explicitly from command line.
Not only is this a repost, I have seen it on Hacker News several times over the past year. Anyone who is searching for a better Git log will find one without the help of free advertisement on the front page.
Many git novices don't know that the log output can even be changed, and aren't likely to be searching for an alternative syntax. Don't assume that just because you know something, everyone else does, an that the training is useless.
Additionally, the discussions that this post created here in the comments have already given me three new aliases that I didn't know we're possible.
clearly you're not very imaginative. not thinking or realizing you can change the output is naive. there are so many people writing up the same hints it's almost impossible not to run into something like this daily. if you seriously rely on 'discussions' to improve your knowledge you're not really thinking for yourself, are you?