On: My two-week review of Google Glass: it all depends...

[rmp2150]

Yeah I understand that but whats the point if the quality is not good. Good Idea. Poor execution.

[michaelt → rmp2150]

The images on the article, like [1] have been downscaled to 480×354 px for the mobile site, then upscaled by your browser.

The original can be accessed via the regular google plus interface [2] and downloaded as 2560x1888 px [3]

The quality is in line with a phone camera.

[1] https://plus.google.com/app/basic/photos/+Scobleizer/album/5... [2] https://plus.google.com/111091089527727420853/posts/ZLV9Gdmk... [3] http://imgur.com/RHmdbi7

[rmp2150 → michaelt]

Thank you for clearing that up.

[dombili → rmp2150]

I don't think the quality is that bad, actually. In low light situations the camera obviously suffers, but that's not a big surprise, considering how small the lens is. Then again, I know nothing about photography.

[Kiro → rmp2150]

You have obviously already made up your mind that the Glasses suck so why do you even want our opinions?