Well, for money if it gives advantage for the issuer it's called seigniorage, it's not different than a central banking printing money and reaping the benefits of a hike in the exchange rate.
It's very different than IP ranges (which is regulated by continent, you have ARIN, APNIC, LACNIC, etc.) or domains (although it's truth that a guy could buy a desirable domain earlier, like photos.com, photo.com or photography.com), in wither case domains and ranges are not designed to be a mean of exchange.
The fact that most until the early 2010 did not moved means nothing to my question, it can be that a owner of a large block sold some, and they waited and then sold some more until he cash out.
That study by Adi Shamir did not claim that by using statistics he could determine that there are not many owners with more than 10,000 Bitcoins? What if a guy in this situation keeps selling or has sold a substantial percentage of what he have? (I do not know how Mt. Gox or whatever works, so I just apply how I know stock exchange works).
To summarize I do not understand your point, your tone appeared confrontational and answering simply a question I did not asked.
EDIT: I see that some guys wrote on the other thread that someone yesterday sold 5,000 bitcoins, although I believe it was a speculative move, could it not be some early adopter cashing out? This is what my question was, in a general setting, asking.
No shit.
And no, most Bitcoins mined in 2009 and early 2010 haven't moved and probably never will.