Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Bitspend - Buy Anything Using Bitcoins (bitspend.net)
76 points by gmaster1440 on March 11, 2013 | hide | past | favorite | 42 comments



Hey Guys, this is Jessica from Bitspend :) I want to cover a few things.

1. Yes, there is a lot wrong with the site right now - including the order form. We had been working all week on the new site, including an automated order-form, and at 4AM this morning we had major issues with the server. Since we had already publicized our launch, we chose to put together what we could for today as we fix the issues that broke the "real" site. We know the site right now is not what it should be - and its killing us too! We promise to have it all fixed shortly.

2. About our contact information. Within the week not only will we have 800 numbers for you to call for support, but we will also have our office address available, and invite anyone in our area to come in and check us out themselves.

We are aware that what we are doing will take time to build trust in the community, and we will go above and beyond to make sure we earn it. We will continue to work on ways to improve our service to you, and to expand our offerings.

We have a long road ahead, just as the Bitcoin economy itself does. We plan on making the most out of it and providing you all with a way to purchase ANYTHING(Legal!!) with Bitcoins.


Cool idea! Few things about the website:

* The navbar on https://www.bitspend.net/order.html isn't consistent with the rest of the site. It's missing the "Order Now" link.

* I want to click your logo to go to the home page.

* You're using the Bootstrap default favicon

* Is the business's name Bitspend or BitSpend? Both appear on the site.

* The links on the bottom of the main page don't go anywhere.

* The text in the jumbotron/masthead is misleading. The item isn't shipped directly to the consumer.

* "Unlimit Your Bitcoins" sounds a bit awkward. What about "Unleash Your Bitcoins"?


My understanding of the business is that the item IS shipped directly to the consumer. I send them X bitcoins (plus a $2 fee), and a link to amazon.com item, and they buy it for me using their credit card, and Amazon ships it to me not them.

You think the item goes to them first?


It says it goes to their warehouse first for "relabeling", then sent to you, "so you can shop anonymously".

It probably also has the benefit of not triggering merchant anti-fraud mechanisms for shipping to all manner of different addresses.


There's two types of packages:

- Standard Order, $2 flat fee

- Anonymous Order, 5% fee


Interesting idea. When I saw the title, my first thoughts went to prepaid one-time credit cards, and I think that might work as a scalable version of this: specify how much you want to spend, send the corresponding amount of BTC (plus fee) to a specified address, and get a credit card number with that much on it to use at an arbitrary merchant that accepts credit cards.


Aside: Are you aware of any APIs for the creation of one-time credit/debit cards?


I don't know of any, no; you'd probably want to partner with a friendly local bank for that. Offering such an API seems like a great unfilled business idea; I can easily think of half a dozen great businesses to build around that API, and a couple of really obvious business models to charge for it.


Interesting. My initial thoughts were around a business built on that (better solving the problem I'm trying to address), but just an API could be huge.

Looking around the internet, I've found a couple related things:

Google Wallet creates a "Virtual OneTime Card" underwritten by The Bancorp Bank for each transaction. https://developers.google.com/commerce/wallet/online/faq

Citibank lets you log into your account and create a "virtual account number." http://blog.credit.com/2011/06/worried-about-online-security...

This (brief) thread in a MasterCard forum, referencing closed APIs. https://developer.mastercard.com/portal/display/forums/One-t...


Clearly a secret CIA scheme to link personal details to bitcoin addresses.


I'm no expert on bitcoin, but I've read that you can have as many addresses as you want. You could generate a new address for each time you order through bitspend and never give them your "main" address. Overall it may or may not be a better option than just buying directly from a merchant because of other considerations.


I thought that's already done by silk road.


Will money-laundering as a service pass legal muster? It'd be interesting if it does. Anyone know of case law that protects an idea like BitSpend?

Anonymous purchasing power is a Good Thing; going through a third party seems like it adds wrinkles.



Gaining trust is key if you want people to give you personal and financial information, and the 30 second Bootstrap website really isn't inspiring any confidence -- especially the visible seams in your pasted together background, the complete lack of form validation, and all the blank links at the bottom.


Coinbase is using basic Bootstrap, they seem to be doing fine, selling over $1M USD per month: http://blog.coinbase.com/post/42587245753/coinbase-is-now-se...


The difference is that YC has invested in Coinbase, which automatically gives them tons of credibility.


To the point, trusting Coinbase for a successful bitcoin purchase can be touch and go.


I'm constantly amused at the nit-picky things people seem to use to determine whether a site is trustworthy.


Yeah, it makes perfect sense to hand your address and bitcoins to anyone with a half-finished Bootstrap website, zero contact information, and zero information about their payment/delivery process.


zero contact information, and zero information about their payment/delivery process

Those are a lot better reasons to have doubts than whether or not their background has a seam in it.


Yes, I'm sure you are talking about the trustworthiness of the company in general (and thus they ability to flee with your money).

But it doesn't help me to think of all the shitty and careless web interface of most of the online banking sites I've used.


What state are you reshipping from? There are sales tax implications unless you are in a state like Oregon.

Also, I'm sure there are users that need an international reship.


Great MVP :) I guess you just receive the orders via the form, and if you see demand, then you start improving the product?


That improvement is already underway!


yikes, hope you have good insurance and a fat legal warchest


This is likely to solicit questions about whether purchases can be anonymous. However, I don't think that matters. As long as an average Joe (who doesn't care about anonymity) can use this to spend bitcoins, the overall acceptance of the currency should increase. That benefits all bitcoin users, including the paranoid ones.


> As long as an average Joe (who doesn't care about anonymity) can use this to spend bitcoins

My question is, why does Joe who doesn't care about anonymity, care about Bitcoin?


If you owe Joe money, he might accept bitcoins because he knows he can use them (minus a fee) at sites like bitspend.


What happens if you need to refund something?


then you get a refund (including fee).

They use some fancy PKI footwork to facilitate returns/refunds without retaining customer/order information.


Unless you're specifically aiming for illegal transactions, I'd remove the specific reference to law enforcement.


I think it's good to have it mentioned, regardless. Too many sites claim they "won't turn over information" or claim they don't keep records, only to later say "ok well for LE, yeah", proving they had your data the entire time.


It's possible to submit the order form at https://www.bitspend.net/order.html and receive a success message without completing any of the fields. No validation - a big bug?


It's an MVP. No point in writing all that validation code just yet - most people understand that you actually have to fill the fields in.


I think an MVP of anything related to finances (be it cash, card, or bitcoin) should include SSL and validation. I see there's SSL.

In any case, adding simple form validation there would have taken <10 minutes with a decent library (especially given that they're already "using" jQuery - though perhaps not actually "using"; it seems that they've taken the Bootstrap example HTML wholesale, and include a bunch of other Bootstrap jQuery plugins that they're not using - or have at least included it).

Apparently their MVP includes a "secure warehouse"... but not ten minutes of Javascript?

There are many things that can be excused under the umbrella of "... but MVP!".

This site is asking people to place their trust in an anonymous entity to the sum of several hundred dollars - I say anonymous because there is ZERO contact information on the site, no address, email (well, other than for Media Requests), or anything.

Speaking of anonymity, there are also no corporate registration records for "Bitspend LLC" in Florida (where the domain is registered), or the US, for that matter.

MVP or not, this site doesn't scream "credibility".


We love the constructive criticism, however we would like to ask that you stick to facts when claiming something:

"Speaking of anonymity, there are also no corporate registration records for "Bitspend LLC" in Florida "

If you did a simple business title search on the FL sunbiz site, you would find Bitspend LLC listed, right at the top :)

As far as your other concerns, we are able to admit that where the site is at this exact moment is not where it should be. We promise to have it up to your standards by end of week!!


I'm willing to stand corrected. I had done a Dun & Bradstreet corporate registration search.

Duly noted!


If you're in the trust industry then validation goes a long way.

I'd put that in the minimal column.


* How do you handle the cost of shipping if the user is not based in the USA?

* If I buy from a non-USA based site, how are the customs charges handled when the items arrives at your warehouse?

* How will you handle returns if the item is defective or damaged?


Not my site, but I think "Standard orders" go direct to you not to a warehouse. You pay shipping from the original seller, whatever they charge. You pay customs fees. Returns are going to be a pain in the ass - don't expect to be able to do that very easily.

For "anonymous orders", the concept doesn't seem thought through very well. Only 5% fee on any order from $1-$300? So I want to buy something from eBay for $1, you will anonymize that for 5 cents? I don't think so. I doubt you'll be able to do international orders anonymously.


Standard Order, Order Total of $1: $2 fee; Guaranteed Anonymity, Order Total of $1: $0.05 fee Is it true?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: