Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

And the terms and conditions of said contract would state that the captain has the absolute right to remove anyone from the flight.

Edit: Reference. RULE 21 REFUSAL TO TRANSPORT in United's Contract of Carriage [1] outlines UA's right to "remove from the aircraft at any point, any Passenger for the following reasons". The reasons are, as you would expect, broad and vague, essentially giving UA cover to remove anyone from the flight.

The one I expect they would cite in this instance is:

H4: "Passengers who, through and as a result of their conduct, cause a disturbance such that the captain or member of the cockpit crew must leave the cockpit in order to attend to the disturbance;"

Other fun conditions that UA have felt the need to enumerate:

21:H5 Passengers who are barefoot or not properly clothed;

21:H16 Passengers who have or cause a malodorous condition

[1]http://www.united.com/web/format/pdf/Contract_of_Carriage.pd...




I'm sure they would cite it. That doesn't make it right, nor does it make him any less of a victim.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: