Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Titan had to pay millions to Washington lawyers to sue the Chinese tire companies because of their subsidizing. Titan won. The government collects the duties. We don't get the duties, the government does.

This is how tariffs work. You don't tax imports to fork over free money to domestic companies. The point is to increase the cost of the imported good to compensate for illegal (from the WTO's point of view) Chinese subsidies.

I'm confused as to why he thinks those taxes should go to Titan.




> I'm confused as to why he thinks those taxes should go to Titan.

Probably because from 2000–2005, under U.S. law [0], anti-dumping duties did get disbursed to the U.S. companies that brought successful anti-dumping complaints. This is illegal under WTO rules, however, and Congress repealed the law after the WTO authorized retaliatory sanctions against the U.S.

0. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byrd_Amendment


I think he thinks he should be reimbursed for the lawsuit expenses.

He does appear to be a bit flippant as well.


I'm confused as to why you think what he wrote indicates an expectation that Titan should receive the duties. I didn't read that into it at all.


>>I'm confused as to why he thinks those taxes should go to Titan.

He could be a stereotypical welfare queen. You know, the type who think they are entitled to "free stuff" at taxpayer expense.


Maybe he meant to say: we were harmed financially, paid lawyers, sued, won and got jack in return.


they got their tariffs, and made life generally harder for their competitors. That's something.


Yeah but generally you should be compensated for the already done damage.




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: