Your logic seems to be that because some runtime code can be harder to debug (This is often true but not always), having personally encountered such, you therefore declare that all runtime code is vastly inferior. Sorry, but this is ridiculous. Can you contribute something more solid than an anecdote?
I'm sorry you think it's ridiculous but it's just my opinion, after all. Feel free to ignore it. Can you give us an example of runtime generated code that is easy to debug?
I can't. However, I do believe that software development in general is headed away from monolithic compilation, and that future systems will be largely real time, parallel, multi-component, perhaps more heterogeneous, and almost certainly predominantly interpreted.
