Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The article makes too black and white a distinction between tinkering and creativity. The author is also very focused on the concept of an idea being fundamentally new in order for it be a creative action. I'm not certain that you can so easily distinguish between a new idea and a variation on an old idea.

As example, was the development of a cell phone a new idea? I believe the idea of combining a radio, a simple computer, and a battery into a portable device intended to connect to the existing telephone network is not particularly creative, but an extraordinarily useful variation on existing ideas. A variation that has had sufficient impact that we tend to think of it as a new idea. If one goes back to the development of each of the pieces, I believe one can paint a similar picture for each of the priors. Even if one goes back as far as basic technology like fire, spears, agriculture or the wheel I think similar stories could be told.

The point of this is not that there are no new ideas under the sun, but that tinkering is the process of experimenting, and I don't particularly believe that it is possible to create a new idea (under whatever definition of new) without experimenting or tinkering with the priors.




extraordinarily useful variation on existing ideas

So could we postulate that tinkering and creativity are not discrete but rather a continuous evolution (a bunch of variations)?




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: