Words.
Since the premise of the article (and the person to which you've replied) is that your statement is false, you're going to need to provide more than the above to refute it.
I did not make the irony clear, my fault.
http://css.csail.mit.edu/6.858/2012/readings/passwords.pdf
Words.
Since the premise of the article (and the person to which you've replied) is that your statement is false, you're going to need to provide more than the above to refute it.