Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

What an aggravating, ignorant, and ahistorical comment.

Besides the responses nearby taking you to task for the sophistry of your last sentence, I feel like it's worth highlighting the very real history of vote suppression in the South under Jim Crow. That's decades of violence, physical intimidation, bogus literacy tests, and a host of other tactics, directed at suppressing the vote of blacks and the poor. At every step of the way, these shameful tactics were justified as some kind of proxy for "intelligence" (and some other "wise" comments here repeat that justification).

Working to increase access to the vote is, in a very real sense, a continuing rejection of these disgusting tactics.

This is why I used the term "ignorant" above. It is as if you do not understand and appreciate the significance of this history. This is not a simple Democrat/Republican issue. Increasing access to the vote is an attempt to remedy, in an imperfect way, the biggest failing of American democracy.




Ah yes, the fun of politics. As soon as someone says something that you disagree with, just flip your emotional switch and let the rant flow.

I actually am quite aware of that history. I am also aware that of dozens of efforts in the last several years to change voting rules, every Republican effort has been to make it harder in the name of reducing fraud, while every Democratic effort has been to make it easier in the name of improving access.

It may not be a simple Democrat/Republican issue, but at this point it is definitely a highly partisan Democrat/Republican issue.


Not a rant. Not a partisan issue unless you make it one. Just the right thing to do.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: